<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter as tech support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ivankamajic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=45" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ivankamajic.com/?p=45</link>
	<description>People. Technology. Design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:46:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pavel</title>
		<link>http://www.ivankamajic.com/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-3648</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 03:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ivankamajic.com/?p=45#comment-3648</guid>
		<description>Twitter as tech support...  Yes.  This is one direction. There is another direction. Strictly answering (from beginning) service www.askville.com slowly (actually not so slowly) became sort of answering/conversation service. People ask questions with only intention to talk to somebody/anybody about .... whatever you could imagine (tipical question &quot;what do you have for dinner?&quot; or similar). How it happened? Askville limited amount of answers, but same time added discussion to each question (discussion has no time/participation limits).  So, discussion sometimes became old friends meeting place talking about something not related to question itself. Same time discussion is a palce for advises, opinions, arguments, etc., etc., etc. Recently Askville added Friends/Followers features. One more social network started.
I think both processes (Twitter --&gt; Tech-support and Answering --&gt; social network) are very natural. We all humans, we need both: usefulness and fun (I use &quot;fun&quot; as very broad therm here). Social network provides both same time. This is the value (one of &quot;the values&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter as tech support&#8230;  Yes.  This is one direction. There is another direction. Strictly answering (from beginning) service <a href="http://www.askville.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.askville.com</a> slowly (actually not so slowly) became sort of answering/conversation service. People ask questions with only intention to talk to somebody/anybody about &#8230;. whatever you could imagine (tipical question &#8220;what do you have for dinner?&#8221; or similar). How it happened? Askville limited amount of answers, but same time added discussion to each question (discussion has no time/participation limits).  So, discussion sometimes became old friends meeting place talking about something not related to question itself. Same time discussion is a palce for advises, opinions, arguments, etc., etc., etc. Recently Askville added Friends/Followers features. One more social network started.<br />
I think both processes (Twitter &#8211;&gt; Tech-support and Answering &#8211;&gt; social network) are very natural. We all humans, we need both: usefulness and fun (I use &#8220;fun&#8221; as very broad therm here). Social network provides both same time. This is the value (one of &#8220;the values&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leisa Reichelt</title>
		<link>http://www.ivankamajic.com/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-3608</link>
		<dc:creator>Leisa Reichelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ivankamajic.com/?p=45#comment-3608</guid>
		<description>Yes, I too am guilty of using Twitter for tech support - but what I find really funny is the number of people who email me or direct message me after I&#039;ve twittered a potentially silly question, asking me what the answer is! :)

It&#039;s another great example of this idea that I came across at Reboot lately.... which was about why it is actually valuable to have these networks that we&#039;re more or less constantly attached to. It&#039;s the idea of being able to short circuit your way to information/contacts etc. that you need from your social network online. who will give you this information because you&#039;ve given them stuff in the past, and the more of this sharing that goes on, the smarter the entire network becomes - which is good for everyone, and makes this networking time a good investment in future efficiency. I tried to write this up semi-coherently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.disambiguity.com/the-non-zero-sum-game-of-social-networking/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I too am guilty of using Twitter for tech support &#8211; but what I find really funny is the number of people who email me or direct message me after I&#8217;ve twittered a potentially silly question, asking me what the answer is! <img src='http://www.ivankamajic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s another great example of this idea that I came across at Reboot lately&#8230;. which was about why it is actually valuable to have these networks that we&#8217;re more or less constantly attached to. It&#8217;s the idea of being able to short circuit your way to information/contacts etc. that you need from your social network online. who will give you this information because you&#8217;ve given them stuff in the past, and the more of this sharing that goes on, the smarter the entire network becomes &#8211; which is good for everyone, and makes this networking time a good investment in future efficiency. I tried to write this up semi-coherently <a href="http://www.disambiguity.com/the-non-zero-sum-game-of-social-networking/" rel="nofollow"> here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
